JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 1, 2004

T-325 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Maria Carmenza Porras Castro Vs. Distrito Militar No. 22 Pereira

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos De Peticion Dignidad Y Libre Desarrollo E La Personalidad. Solicitud Entrega Libreta Militar Para Salir Del Pais. Omision Injustificada. Principio De Legalidad. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Hecho Superado. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Entrega de libreta militar
  • Características
Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por entrega de libreta militar
Derecho Al Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad
  • Ejercicio limitado por omisión injustificada en entrega de libreta militar
Tarjeta Militar
  • Omisión en su entrega vulnera derecho fundamental
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Levantar la suspension de terminos ordenada en el presente caso mediante auto del 2 de febrero de 2004.
  2. Segundo. Debido a la presencia de un hecho superado, confirmar la decision adoptada el 3 de julio de 2003 por el juzgado penal del circuito de Anserma -Caldas-, en el sentido de negar el amparo solicitado por la senora MARIA CARMENZA PORRAS CASTRO.
  3. Tercero. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.