JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 1, 1994

T-302 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Beiba Edilia Cuartas De Hernandez

✓
Topic · hard data
Hijo Unico De Madre Soltera Como Sujeto Exento Del Servicio Militar. Der. De Peticion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 59 Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, en el sentido de conceder la tutela al derecho de peticion.
  2. SEGUNDO. REVOCAR la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 59 Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, en cuanto no tutelo lo atinente a la proteccion de la familia; y en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela en lo referente al punto precitado.
  3. TERCERO. En consecuencia, se ORDENA a la Seccion de Reclutamiento del Ejercito Nacional desacuartelar al joven Juan Carlos Cubillos Hernandez debido a que se encuentra dentro de los supuestos de la exencion del servicio militar obligatorio que consagra el literal c) del articulo 28 de la Ley 48 de 1993.
  4. CUARTO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 59 Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, a la Seccion de Reclutamiento del Ejercito Nacional, al Defensor del Pueblo y a la peticionaria de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.