JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 25, 2004

T-300 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Gloria Maria Ramirez Osorno Vs. Banco Colpatria

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Informacion. Solicitud Reconstruccion Historia Crediticia Desaparecida Y Deteriorada. Contrato De Mutuo Con Garantia Hipotecaria. Upac. Deber De Informacion. Principio De Subsidiariedad. Precedente Jurisprudencial. Nadie Esta Obligado A Lo Impo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Informacion En Relaciones Contractuales
  • Obligación de medio
  • Contenido
  • Historial del crédito bancario
Acción De Tutela
  • Caso en que no se está obligando a lo imposible
  • Subsidiariedad
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar las sentencias proferidas por los Juzgados
  2. Séptimo. Penal Municipal de Medellín y
  3. Cuarto. Penal del Circuito de Medellín y en su lugar conceder el amparo del derecho fundamental a recibir información de la ciudadana Gloria María Ramírez Osorno.
  4. Segundo. Ordenar al representante legal del Banco Colpatria Red Multibanca Colpatria S.A., que adelante las conductas activas que estén a su alcance con el propósito de reconstruir la historia del crédito celebrado entre Gloria María Ramírez Osorno y Corpavi, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en las consideraciones 17 y 18 de la presente sentencia.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaría General librar las comunicaciones de que trata el Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  6. Comuníquese, notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.