JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 22, 1994

T-292 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Mahilin Mosquera Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Protecc. De Los Ders. Const/Nales De La Mujer Embarazada. Libertad De Aprendizaje. Alumna Del Mayor De C/Marca. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Maternidad
  • Protección
Derecho A La Educación
  • Estudiante embarazada
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Revocar la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Sala Civil, el 19 de enero de 1994, y en su lugar, confirmar la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Dieciséis Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá el día 9 de diciembre de 1993.
  4. Segundo. Ordenar al Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho horas resuelva sobre la petición de reserva de cupo presentada por la señora Mahilín Mosquera Ramírez y que acceda a la readmisión de la misma para la facultad de Bacteriología.
  5. Tercero. Comunicar lo resuelto en esta providencia a al Juzgado Dieciséis Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá para efectos del Cumplimiento de la misma de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.