JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 16, 1994

T-285 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Ligia Yanette Fuentes

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Suplantacion De Jurisdiccion Eclesiastica. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia de la Honorable corte Suprema de Justicia -Sala de Casacion Civil- del
  4. primero. de febrero de mil novecientos noventa y cuatro (1994), proferida en el caso de la referencia.
  5. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente decision al Honorable Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota -Sala de Familia-, para los efectos del articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 6cited by 5 →T-285/94T-225/93 — Acciones Populares. Acueducto De Nariño (C/Marca). Provision De Agua Potable. Negada. · cited 1,353 timesT-225/931993C-134/94 — Dec. 2591/91. Art. 42 Inc. 12 Y 9. Tutela Contra Particulares. Exequibles Salvo N° 1 Expresion "para Proteger... Autonomia" Que Es Inexequib · cited 255 timesC-134/941994C-027/93 — Ley 20/74. Concordato. Exequibles E Inexequibles. Ver Auto 005/93. · cited 77 timesC-027/931993T-573/92 — Tutela Contra Particulares. Derecho A La Integridad Personal. Derecho A La Vida. Indefension. · cited 73 timesT-573/921992T-251/93 — Derecho Al Ambiente Sano. Derecho A La Salud. Soc. Proquimhul. Concedida. · cited 63 timesT-251/931993T-507/93 — Los Particulares En La Prestacion Del Servicio Publico De Correos. Derecho De Peticion. Servientrega. Concedida. · cited 49 timesT-507/931993C-507/97 — Dec. 2277/97. Art. 10 Parcial. Estructura Del Escalafon Docente. Inexequibles. · cited 45 timesC-507/971997T-449/18 — Derecho De Peticion Ante Autoridad Eclesiastica, · cited 13 timesT-449/182018T-1099/03 — Derecho Al Debido Proceso De Menor De Edad Con Trastorno Hiperactivo. "deficit De Atencion". Solicitud Reintegro. Realizacion Procedimiento · cited 13 timesT-1099/032003T-444/20 — Cotizaciones Al Sistema General De Pensiones De Los Miembros De Comunidades Religiosas Y Congregaciones · cited 8 timesT-444/202020SU.059/24 — Principio De Laicidad, De Confianza Legítima Y Autonomía Universitaria-Libertad Religiosa, De Conciencia Y De Cultos. Derecho A La Igualdad SU.059/242024
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.