JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 28, 1992

T-573 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Ciro Angarita Baron

✓Claimant Juan Guacaneme

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Derecho A La Integridad Personal. Derecho A La Vida. Indefension.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del diecinueve de junio de 1992, proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Alban, departamento de Cundinamarca, por medio de la cual se resolvio favorablemente la tutela interpuesta por Juan Guacaneme Garcia en contra del particular Carlos Ulises Cardenas.
  2. SEGUNDO. En todos los casos similares al presente, por sus hechos o circunstancias, siempre que se configure una indefension frente a un particular y de ella se derive vulneracion o amenaza a la vida, la doctrina constitucional establecida en esta providencia, tendra caracter obligatorio para las autoridades, en los terminos del articulo 23 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. TERCERO. Ordenar que por Secretaria se comunique esta providencia al Juzgado Promiscuo de Alban, Cundinamarca, para los efectos del articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.