JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 14, 2008

T-283 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Leonel Ospina Meneses·Respondent Instituto De Seguros Sociales Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra El Seguro Social
  • Hecho superado por cancelación de mesada pensional reconocida
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida, al minimo vital y al debido proceso de persona a quien la entidad no le cancela su mesada pensional reconocida mediante acto administrativo.<br>solicita se ordene el pago de las mesadas pensionales causadas y no canceladas desde el momento en que acredito el cumplimiento de los requisitos legales.<br>imposibilidad de dictar una orden de proteccion constitucional cuando se configura un hecho superado.<br>la entidad accionada procedio a ordenar el ingreso del actor a la nomina de pensionados y hasta la fecha ha continuado con el pago de la mesada correspondiente.<br>carencia actual de objeto

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por el Juzgado Once Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, el 2 de agosto de 2007, y de la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Circuito Medellín, el 12 de septiembre del 2007, por las razones de esta providencia, dada la ocurrencia de un hecho superado.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrese la comunicación a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.