JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 21, 1998

T-242 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Gilberto Guzman Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Vida Y A La Seguridad Social. Der. Al Minimo Vital. Suspension De Pago De Mesadas Pensionales. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pago de mesadas pensionales atrasadas
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • No pago de prestaciones sociales frente a prohibición de prisión por deudas
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Persona De La Tercera Edad
  • Pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales actuales y futuras
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia materia de revisión y en su lugar, tutelar los derechos a la vida y a la seguridad social de GILBERTO FRANCISCO GUZMAN DIAZ.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde Municipal de Riohacha que, si aún no lo ha hecho, reanude el pago de las mesadas pensionales de GILBERTO FRANCISCO GUZMAN DIAZ en el termino máximo de 48 horas contados a partir de la notificación de la presente providencia, so pena de las sanciones previstas en el Decreto 2591 de 1991 para el desacato.
  3. Tercero. ENVIAR copia del presente fallo a la Procuraduría General de la Nación para los efectos señalados en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  4. Cuarto. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al juzgador de primera instancia para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.