JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 9, 1996

T-204 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Antonio Jose Ortiz

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Tiempo Para Resolver La Solicitud. Reconocimiento De Pension De Jubilacion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Informalidad
  • Diligencia en tramitación
  • Efectividad
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Santa Fe de Bogotá, D.C. y la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho de petición del señor Antonio José Ortíz Barbosa, ordenando a la Caja de Previsión Social de Santa Fe de Bogotá que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la comunicación de esta providencia, de respuesta al actor.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR a través de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Santa Fe de Bogotá D.C, a la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, a la Caja de Previsión Social de Santa Fe de Bogotá, y al peticionario de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.