JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 9, 1996

T-524 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jose Fernando Escobar Morales

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Devolucion De Dineros Al Instituto De La Reforma Urbana. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Resolución sustancial
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, la sentencia proferida dentro del expediente T-101.083, por el Juzgado 7º Civil Municipal de Cali.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR a través de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 7º Civil Municipal de Cali, para efectos de que se surtan las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.