JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 26, 2004

T-166 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Luz Gloria Arias Ospina Vs Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Respuesta Pronta Y Oportuna. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Vejez. Terminos Para Responder. Llamado A Prevencion. Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por los Juzgados
  2. Septimo. Civil del Circuito de Santiago de Cali (T-801357); Juzgado
  3. Quinto. Laboral del Circuito de Ibague (T-802189); Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla Sala Penal (T-836416); Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla Sala Penal (T-836418) y Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla Sala Penal (T-836420) dentro de las acciones de tutela instauradas por los ciudadanos Luz Gloria Arias Ospina, Antonio Otalvaro, Idalides Maestre de Quiroga, Ofelia de Lourdes Bonell Madiedo y Juan Bautista Jimenez Pacheco, respectivamente, por cuanto negaron la proteccion del derecho fundamental de peticion.
  4. Segundo. En su lugar, CONCEDER el amparo solicitado por los actores. ORDENAR al Seguro Social, Seccionales Valle del Cauca, Tolima y Atlantico que si aun no lo ha hecho, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de esta providencia proceda a pronunciarse de fondo sobre el objeto de las peticiones elevadas por los peticionarios.
  5. Tercero. PREVENIR al Seguro Social, Seccionales Valle del Cauca, Tolima y Atlantico para que en el futuro se abstenga de incurrir en esta clase de actuaciones que vulneran los derechos fundamentales de sus afiliados.
  6. Cuarto. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.