JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 15, 2008

T-150 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Hilda Stella Yepes Sanz·Respondent Saludcoop Eps

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Caso en que no se cumple el requisito de incapacidad económica para costearlo
  • Práctica de examen que no está contemplado en el POS
Derecho A La Salud Del Menor
  • Práctica de examen médico, así no haya sido ordenado por Médico adscrito al ISS
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la salud de persona que solicito la practica de examen prescrito por su medico tratante, el cual fue negado por la entidad al no encontrarse incluido dentro del plan de beneficios del pos.<br>solicita se ordene la autorizacion y practica del examen.<br>requisitos delineados por la jurisprudencia constitucional para la inaplicación del régimen de exclusiones y limitaciones del pos.<br>en el caso concreto no se acredito la incapacidad economica para sufragar de manera particular el examen requerido.<br>negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal Municipal de Leticia-Amazonas el treinta y uno (31) de agosto de dos mil siete (2007).
  3. Segundo. Líbrese por Secretaría General la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.