JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 26, 2000

T-1451 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Arturo Quiceno Herrera Y Otros Vs. Consorcio Concesion Cienaga - Barranquilla Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Medio Ambiente Sano Y Salud. Acciones Populares Y Accion De Tutela. Criterios De Procedibilidad Frente A La Vulneracion De Derechos Colectivos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empresas De Servicios Publicos
  • Adecuación redes de alcantarillado
Juez Constitucional
  • Demostración fehaciente de que la vulneración de un derecho colectivo conlleva la vulneración de derechos fundamentales
Accion Popular
  • Obras de alcantarillado
  • Vulneración de derechos colectivos
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCASE el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Cienaga -Magdalena- en la accion de tutela instaurada por Arturo Quiceno Herrera, Sara Julia Herrera Reales, Miguel Alfonso Granados Forero, Jose Santander Sierra y Jorge Luis Fernandez de Castro contra el Consorcio Concesion Cienaga-Barranquilla y el Municipio de Cienaga-Magdalena. En su lugar, DENIEGASE el amparo solicitado por los actores.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.