JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 28, 2002

T-143 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Jose Libardo Jacome Chavez Vs. Secretaria Local De Salud De Villavicencio Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida. Continuidad Tratamiento Medico. Legitimacion Para Actuar. Participantes Vinculados. Confianza Legitima. Afiliados Al Regimen Contributivo O Subsidiado. Sisben. Proceso De Carnetizacion. Llamado A Prevencion. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sisben
  • Carné de afiliado no es el que otorga el derecho
Derecho A La Salud
  • Suministro de tratamiento para el cáncer
Secretaria De Salud
  • Debe adelantar diligencias necesarias para obtener carnet del SISBEN y asignación de una ARS
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Villavicencio.
  2. Segundo. PREVENIR a la Secretaria Local de Salud de Villavicencio para que inicie las diligencias necesarias para la carnetizacion en el SISBEN de la senora SANDRA AYDEE GAVIRIA MORALES y le asigne una A.R.S., de acuerdo a los cupos disponibles para ello, y teniendo en cuenta que esta en riesgo de padecer una enfermedad ruinosa cuya atencion no puede ser suspendida.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.