JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 18, 2019

T-121 de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Antonio Nel Zuñiga Caballero·Respondent Tribunal Superior De Medellin, Sala Penal

✓
Topic · hard data
Carencia Actual De Objeto Por Fallcecimiento Del Accionante.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se atribuye un defecto fáctico a una decisión judicial proferida al interior de un proceso penal, como consecuencia de haber valorado indebidamente el material probatorio utilizado para proferir condena en contra del accionante.

Así mismo, se cuestiona la decisión de la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, de inadmitir el recurso de casación interpuesto contra el referido fallo.

Teniendo en cuenta que en sede de revisión se demostró que el accionante falleció, la Sala decidió declarar la CARENCIA ACTUAL DE OBJETO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por la Salas de Casacion Civil y Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, adoptados respectivamente el 29 de junio de 2018 y el 15 de agosto del mismo ano, que negaron en ambas instancias la accion de tutela promovida por Antonio Nel Zuniga Caballero contra la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Medellin. En su lugar, DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto en razon del fallecimiento del actor.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General librese las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.