JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 12, 2003

T-1069 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Compañía De Seguros Generales Condor Contra La Sala Civil Del Tribunal Superior De Medellin

✓
Topic · hard data
Via De Hecho. Se Dejo Sin Efectos Auto Que Ordeno Interrumpir Proceso Ordinario Por Enfermedad De Apoderada De Entidad Demandada. Declaratoria De Desierto De Recurso De Casacion. Monto De La Caucion Para Efectos De Suspension De Ejecucion De Sentencia. Ar
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Caucion En Proceso Ordinario De Mayor Cuantia
  • Controversia sobre monto señalado para suspender ejecución de sentencia
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para revivir debates procesales debidamente concluidos
3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 17 de julio de 2003, dentro del proceso de tutela instaurado por la Compania de Seguros Generales Condor S.A., contra la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Medellin, pero por las razones expresadas en esta sentencia.
  2. Segundo. LIBRENSE por Secretaria General las Comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.