JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 10, 2005

T-105 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ligia Corredor Espitia Vs. Banco Av Villas Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Credito Hipotecario
  • Suspensión de procesos solo se aplica para créditos de vivienda
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la igualdad el debido proceso y el derecho de defensa de deudora del banco av villas en el sistema upac madre cabeza de familia contra quien el banco inicio demanda ejecutiva con titulo hipotecario y el juzgado decreto el remate del bien.

Solicita se decrete la terminación del proceso ejecutivo hipotecario y se declare la nulidad de lo actuado.

La corte no observa que se este ante una via de hecho y menos que revista las características de gravedad que ha examinado la jurisprudencia de la corte ni tampoco existen irregularidades que no sean susceptibles de ser resueltas en el interior del proceso.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. Confirmar la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil, de fecha 3 de agosto de 2004, en la acción de tutela presentada por Ligia Corredor Espitia contra el Banco AV Villas y el Juzgado Promiscuo Civil del Circuito de Yopal.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.