JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 22, 2007

T-1017 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Luz Elena Martinez Osorio Vs. Municipio De La Virgina - Risaralda Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por cuanto ya se entregó vivienda a la demandante
Derecho A La Vivienda Digna
  • Fundamental
  • Procedencia de tutela como mecanismo de protección cuando adquiere rango fundamental
  • Alcance y contenido
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la vida la igualdad la vida digna y los derechos de los niños de adjudicataria de vivienda de interes social en el marco del programa de reubicacion de zonas de alto riesgo en el municipio por el retraso en la construccion y la adjudicacion del inmueble.solicita se ordene la entrega oportuna de la vivienda de interes social adjudicada.el derecho a la vivienda digna.

Alcance y contenido.

Procedencia de la accion de tutela.

Hecho superado por la entrega efectuada a la accionante de la pretendida unidad habitacional.negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR por las razones expresadas en esta providencia, la sentencia del 8 de mayo de 2007 proferida por el Tribunal de lo Contencioso Administrativo de Risaralda
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.