JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 14, 2004

T-1009 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Yuderly Cortinez Vargas Vs. Saludcoop

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Afiliada A Quien La Eps No Le Reconoce La Licencia De Maternidad Por No Cumplir Con El Periodo Minimo De Cotización. Solicita Se Ordene El Pago De La Licencia De Maternidad Por Haber Cumplido Con El Pleno De Los Periodos De Coti
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Ampliación del término al primer año de vida del niño para presentar la tutela
  • Pago por tutela cuando afecta el mínimo vital de la madre y su hijo
Mujer Embarazada
  • Protección constitucional especial
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR, la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal Municipal de Neiva de 26 de mayo de 2004. En consecuencia, CONCEDER la tutela al derecho fundamental al mínimo vital de la señora Yuderly Cortinez Vargas.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a SaludCoop E.P.S., Regional Huila que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes, contadas a partir de la notificación del presente fallo, proceda a pagar la licencia de maternidad a la señora Yuderly Cortinez Vargas.
  4. TERCERO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.