JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 13, 2002Full bench

C-977 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Arabella Hernandez Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Suspension Provisional De Acto Administrativo Y Medida Preventiva De Solicitud De Suspension Por Procurador General Y Personero Distrital. Distinción
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Interpretacion De Norma Acusada
  • Carácter semántico, originario, finalista y sistemático
Principio De Colaboracion Armonica Entre Organos Del Estado
  • No integrantes de las ramas del poder público
Ministerio Publico En Asunto De Constitucionalidad
  • No es demandante pero puede plantear argumentos adicionales
Medida Preventiva En Proceso Disciplinario Por Procurador General Y Personero Distrital De Bogota
  • Solicitud de suspensión de procedimiento administrativo, actos, contratos o su ejecución
  • Solicitud por vulneración del ordenamiento jurídico o defraudación al patrimonio público
Norma Acusada
  • Sentido de la disposición
Procurador General Y Personero Distrital De Bogota
  • Facultades en el proceso disciplinario
Procuraduría General De La Nación
  • Desarrollo legislativo de funciones preventivas
  • Funciones de naturaleza preventiva
15 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 734 de 2002.

Art. 160.

Codigo disciplinario unico.

Medidas preventivas.

Procurador general y personero distrital de bogota.

Suspension actos y procesos administrativos.

Divergencia interpretativa.

Contratacion estatal.

Suspension en prevencion.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 734/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 160Ley 734/02UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 160 de la Ley 734 de 2002, "por el cual se expide el Codigo Disciplinario Unico", con respecto de los cargos analizados y en los terminos de la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.