JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 1, 2001Full bench

C-813 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Francisco Garcia Quintero

✓
Topic · hard data
Prima De Antiguedad De La Rama Judicial Y Ministerio Publico. Integra La Remuneración
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Facultades Extraordinarias
  • Concesión bajo Constitución anterior
  • Fijación de escalas de remuneración
  • Fijación de escalas de remuneración de Rama "Jurisdiccional" y Ministerio Público
  • Temporalidad y materialidad
Ley
  • Fijación de escalas de remuneración
Prima De Antigüedad
  • Parte integrante del salario
Unidad Normativa
  • Carácter excepcional
Rama Judicial Y Ministerio Publico
  • Porcentaje máximo de prima de antigüedad
Salario
  • Factores que lo integran
8 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 306 de 1983.

Art. 9.

Escala de remuneracion de la rama jurisdiccional ministerio publico direcciones de instruccion criminal justicia penal militar.

Prima de antigüedad.

Reconocimiento y pago.

Porcentaje maximo del 96%.

Facultades extraordinarias.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 306/83. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 9Decreto 306/83UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 9 del decreto 306 de 1983, pero únicamente por no haber excedido el legislador extraordinario los límites temporal y material fijados en la ley de habilitación legislativa (57/82).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.