JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 24, 2005Full bench

C-544 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jaime Mejia Ossman Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Falta Disciplinaria Gravisima. Por Haberse Impuesto La Tercera Sanción Disciplinaria En Cinco Años
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Estatuto Del Sistema Financiero
  • Inhabilidad derivada del hecho de haber sido sancionado por incumplimiento de normas sobre cupos individuales
Inhabilidades Para Notario
  • Funcionarios o empleados de Rama judicial o Ministerio Público que por falta disciplinaria fueron destituidos
Inhabilidades Para Acceder A Cargos Publicos
  • Por haberse impuesto la tercera sanción disciplinaria en cinco años
  • Comisión de delito castigado con pena privativa de la libertad
Inhabilidades Para Concejal
  • Condena a pena privativa de la libertad
Inhabilidades Para Personero
  • Por sanción disciplinaria
Inhabilidades
  • Naturaleza
  • No constituyen una pena
  • Finalidad
  • Tipos
Falta Disciplinaria Gravisima
  • Por haberse impuesto la tercera sanción disciplinaria en cinco años
7 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 734 de 2002 articulo 38 (parcial).

Otras inhabilidades para desempeñar cargos publicos.

Naturaleza juridica de la disposicion demandada.

Naturaleza y clasificacion de las inhabilidades.

Jurisprudencia constitucional en la materia.

Exequibilidad de la norma demandada.

Por no contradecir jurisprudencia constitucional y no entrañar vulneración al derecho akl debido proceso la corte desetimara las pretensiones de la demanda.

Exequible

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 734/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 38Ley 734/02 «numeral 2»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. UNICO.- Exclusivamente por el cargo analizado en esta providencia, declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 2o del articulo 38 de la Ley 734 de 2002.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.