JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 23, 1995Full bench

C-541 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Jorge Garcia Hurtado Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 179/94. Varios Arts. Por La Cual Se Introducen Modificaciones A La Ley 38/89. Organica Del Presupuesto Exequible E Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 179/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 17Ley 179/94UPHELD
Art. 54Ley 179/94UPHELD
Art. 66Ley 179/94STRUCK DOWN· in part
Phrase struck down«y la que se dicte no tendrá ningún efecto»
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (8 points)
  1. Primero. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  2. tercero. del artículo 17 de la ley 179 de 1994.
  3. Segundo. Declárase INHIBIDA la Corte para fallar en relación con el parágrafo del artículo 17 de la ley 179 de 1994, porque los actores no sustentaron cargo alguno en su contra.
  4. Tercero. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 54 de la ley 179 de 1994.
  5. Cuarto. Declárase EXEQUIBLE la siguiente frase del inciso
  6. tercero. del artículo 66 de la ley 179 de 1994 "Cualquier disposición en contrario quedará derogada"; y se declara INEXEQUIBLE la siguiente frase, con que termina el mismo inciso
  7. tercero. del artículo 66 de la ley 179 de 1994: "...y la que se dicte no tendrá ningún efecto."
  8. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.