JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 16, 2001Full bench

C-503 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Ernesto Rey Cantor

✓
Topic · hard data
Facultades Extraordinarias En Instituto De Medicina Legal. Modificación De Estructura
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Facultades Extraordinarias
  • Finalidad
  • Solicitud por Ministros
  • Antecedentes
  • Aprobación por mayoría especial
  • Firma supletiva de Ministro del Interior en solicitud
  • Necesidad y conveniencia pública
  • Precisión
  • Solicitud expresa por Gobierno
  • Solicitud por Ministros en representación del Gobierno
  • Temporalidad
  • Requisitos
Ministerio Del Interior Y De Justicia
  • Coordinación de relaciones con el legislativo
Ley
  • Sanción
Proyecto De Ley
  • Propuestas y enmiendas
7 topics · 17 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 573 de 2000.

Art 1.

Num 3.

(p).

Facultades extraordinarias al gobierno para reestructurar el instituto de medicina legal y ciencias forences.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 573/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Ley 573/00 «numeral 3»UPHELD
On the entire provisionDecreto 261/00UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion, oido el concepto del Procurador General de la Nacion y surtidos los tramites que ordena el Decreto 2067 de 1991,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarase la EXEQUIBILIDAD, en lo acusado, del numeral
  4. tercero. del Articulo 1 de la Ley 573 de 2000, por los cargos formulados por el actor.
  5. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en los articulos 16 y 18 del Decreto 2067 de 1991,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.