C-424 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
✓Claimant Ivette Josefina Gardeazabal Micolta
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Concepto
- Requisitos
- No configuración por inexistencia de identidad formal
- Respeto del precedente
- Aplicación
- Cómputo como factor salarial
- Exclusión como factor salarial
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Decreto 1661 de 1991 articulo 7.
Se modifica el regimen de prima tecnica se establece un sistema para otorgar estimulos especiales a los mejores empleados oficiales y se dictan otras disposiciones.
Forma de pago y compatibilidad con los gastos de representacion.
La actora considera que la norma demandada genera un trato desigual entre los funcionarios y desconoce los articulos 4 9 25 53 y 93 superiores.
De la cosa juzgada material y del respeto del precedente.
La corte reitera los argumentos de la sentencia c-279 de 1996 para declarar la inconstitucionalidad del articulo 7 del decreto 1661 de 1991.
Estese a lo resuelto en c-279 de 1996
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 1661/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- RESUELVE
- ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-279 de 1996 y, en consecuencia, declarar exequible el artículo 7º del Decreto 1661 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.