JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 19, 1992Full bench

C-416 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Luis Carlos Avellaneda

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 112/91. Remuneracion De Docentes De La Universidad De La Amazonia. Inexequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 112/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 16Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 19Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 20Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 3Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 5Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 8Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 9Decreto 112/91STRUCK DOWN
7 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Decláranse INEXEQUIBLES los artículos 3, 5, 8, 9, 16, 19 y 20 del Decreto 112 de enero 14 de 1991, "Por el cual se establece el régimen de remuneración del personal de empleados públicos docentes de la Universidad de la Amazonia y se dictan otras disposiciones en materia salarial".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.