JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 30, 2002Full bench

C-310 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Maria Lourdes Ledesma Monroy

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Material En Término Para Definición De Situación Jurídica En Procesos De Justicia Especializada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Efectos respecto de exequibilidad
  • Predicable de fallos de exequibilidad o inexequibilidad
  • Vincula a todas las autoridades
  • Alcance
  • Categorías del alcance
  • Extensión por igual al continente de la norma como al contenido material
  • Valor jurídico y fuerza vinculante
  • Efectos respecto de inexequibilidad
Cosa Juzgada Material
  • Término para definición de situación jurídica en procesos de justicia especializada
5 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 600 de 2000.

Art. 13 (trans.).

Codigo de procedimiento penal.

Delitos de competencia de los jueces penales del circuito especializados.

Indagatoria.

Definicion situacion juridica.

Ampliacion del termino.

Cosa juzgada material.

Ley 504 de 1999.

Estese a lo resuelto en sentencia c-392/00

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 13Ley 600/00UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. En relacion con la demanda formulada contra el articulo 13 transitorio de la Ley 600 de 2000, ESTESE a lo resuelto en Sentencia C-392 de 2000 en la cual se declaro EXEQUIBLE el articulo 24 de la Ley 504 de 1999. En consecuencia declarese EXEQUIBLE el articulo 13 de la Ley 600 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.