JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 17, 1997Full bench

C-197 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carmenza Isaza de Goméz

✓Claimant Alirio Uribe Muñoz Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 223/95. Art. 207210211 Y 212 Parciales. Impuesto Al Consumo Del Cigarrillo Y Tabaco. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impuesto Al Consumo
  • Obligación a pesar de diversas técnicas de producción
  • Gravamen de hecho objetivo
  • Hecho generador
Impuesto Al Consumo De Cigarrillo Y Tabaco Elaborado
  • Potestad impositiva para establecer modelos de vida
  • Determinación por legislador
  • Potestad del Estado
Impuesto Al Consumo De Cigarrillo Y Tabaco
  • No desconoce equidad de tributos
Tabaco Elaborado
  • Alcance del término
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 223/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 207Ley 223/95UPHELD
Art. 210Ley 223/95UPHELD
Art. 211Ley 223/95UPHELD
Art. 212Ley 223/95UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el término " y tabaco elaborado" contenido en los artículos 207, 210, 211 y 212 de la ley 223 de 1995, pero sólo por los aspectos analizados en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.