C-1544 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant Dario Platarrueda Vanegas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Ausencia de cargos
- Correspondencia entre el cargo y la norma
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 546/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. En relacion con los articulos 3, 17, y en lo relativo a las expresiones acusadas de los articulos 39 y 41 de la Ley 546 de 1999, ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-955 del 26 de julio de 2000, proferida por esta Corporacion.
- Segundo. SE INHIBE la Corte de proferir fallo de merito respecto de los articulos 48 y 49 de la Ley 546 de 1999, por presentarse ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.