JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 4, 2003Full bench

C-072 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Nicolas Tirado T.

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 361 De 1997. Art. 33 (P.). Mecanismos De Integracion Social De Personas Con Limitacion Y Pensionada. Integracion Laboral. Ingreso Al Servicio Publico O Privado. Perdida O Suspension De La Mesada Pensional. Doble Asignacion Del Tesoro Publico. Exequibl
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Disminuido Fisico, Sensorial Y Psiquico
  • Protección constitucional especial
Derecho Al Trabajo De Persona Con Limitaciones
  • Reintegro a la actividad laboral
  • Alcance
  • Condiciones de privilegios aceptables
Persona Con Limitaciones
  • Mecanismos de integración social
Persona Con Limitaciones Pensionada
  • No suspensión de mesada por ingreso a actividad laboral
Pension De Invalidez
  • Extinción, disminución o aumento
Salario
  • Definición
Pensión De Invalidez
  • Revisión periódica
12 topics · 13 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 361/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 33Ley 361/97UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresión "ni suspensión" contenida en el artículo 33 de la Ley 361 de 1997 "por la cual se establecen mecanismos de integración social de las personas con limitación y se dictan otras disposiciones" por los cargos estudiados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.