JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 5, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Bernardo Abel Hoyos Martínez Y Omar Osvaldo Villa Monsalve

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Contra Auto De R Rechazo Proferido Dentro Del Proceso D-7472 En El Que Se Demanda La Inconstitcuionalidad Del Artículo 6 (Parcial) De La Ley 472 De 1998. Se Decidió Denegar El Recurso Porque El Memorial Correctivo De La Demanda En Cuestión Fue Presentada De Manera Extemporánea. Rechazado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Rechazo De Demanda De Constitucionalidad
  • Vencimiento en silencio del término concedido para subsanar el libelo
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CONFIRMAR el auto del veinte (20) de octubre de 2008 dictado por el Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria, en el sentido de rechazar la demanda interpuesta por Bernardo Abel Hoyos Martinez y Omar Osvaldo Villa Monsalve contra el articulo 6deg (parcial) de la Ley 472 de 1998.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.