JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 23, 2003

T-986 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Gloria Esperanza Becerra Vs. Coomeva

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Madre E Hijo. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago Licencia De Maternidad. Mora En Pago De Aportes Por Empleador. Allanamiento A La Mora. Oportunidad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Jurisdiccion Laboral
  • Pago de licencia de maternidad
Licencia De Maternidad
  • Objeto
  • Pago por tutela cuando afecta el mínimo vital de la madre y su hijo
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Pago por allanamiento a la mora por EPS
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por instaurarla cuando la licencia de maternidad ya había expirado
Derechos De La Mujer Embarazada
  • Protección constitucional especial
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 23 de mayo de 2003 por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal Municipal de Duitama.
  3. Segundo. Negar la tutela de los derechos fundamentales invocados por Gloria Esperanza Becerra.
  4. Tercero. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.