JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 8, 2007

T-943 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Jennifer Ximena Romero Ortiz Vs. Saludcoop

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Caso en que la demandante no es madre cabeza de familia
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al minimo vital y el del recien nacido de afiliada a quien la entidad se niega a reconocerle y pagarle la licencia de maternidad aduciendo la no cotizacion durante la totalidad del periodo de gestacion.solicita se ordene el reconocimiento y pago de la licencia de materidad.naturaleza de la licencia de maternidad.

Proteccion constitucional.

Procedencia de la accion de tutela para el pago de la licencia de maternidad.

En el presente caso teniendo en cuenta la situacion familiar y economica de la accionante no se ve afectado ningun derecho fundamental tanto de la madre como del menor.negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la decisión proferida por el Juzgado 3 Penal del Circuito de Villavicencio, el día 18 de abril de 2007, que a su vez confirmó la decisión proferida por el Juzgado 3 Penal Municipal de Villavicencio, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.