JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 19, 1999

T-938 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Nelly Gaviria Querubin

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo Pago Salarios.Alcaldia Yolombo Ancianato San Lorenzo. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Medellín. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental al trabajo.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde del Municipio de Yolombó, que dentro sus competencias constitucionales y legales, se asegure de que las personas que administran el Centro de Bienestar del Anciano "San Lorenzo", cancelen en un plazo máximo de treinta (30) días, contados a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia, los sueldos adeudados a las señoras Nelly Gaviria Querubín, Nohemy Aguirre Valencia y María Elsy Ruíz Londoño, tan pronto el flujo de caja lo permita. Si este fuere insuficiente, dispondrán del término ya señalado para iniciar las gestiones tendientes a obtener los recursos necesarios para el pago efectivo y completo de lo ordenado.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.