JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 29, 2000

T-807 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Edmundo Luis Yela Delgado

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud De La Asociacion Muisca Para Administrar Recursos Del Regimen Subsidiado De Salud. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conceptos Juridicos
  • Por regla general no son actos administrativos
  • Por excepción se convierten en actos administrativos
Acto Administrativo
  • Por regla general no tiene modelo específico
Derecho De Peticion
  • Alcance
  • Improcedencia por respuesta oportuna
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia, el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, en febrero catorce (14) del ano 2000, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Edmundo Luis Yela Delgado como representante de la Asociacion Mutual Empresa Solidaria de Salud "Muisca" en contra de la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.