JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 11, 1998

T-776 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Angel Custodio Ramirez Garzon

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Condena Del Demandante Por Falta De Defensa Tecnica. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Via De Hecho
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
Derecho De Defensa En Proceso Penal
  • Práctica y controversia de pruebas y decisión de condena
Via De Hecho En Proceso Penal
  • Elementos adicionales a demostrar por fallas en la defensa técnica
  • Falta de defensa técnica en etapa de juzgamiento
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Manizales.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR parcialmente la sentencia del Juzgado
  3. Séptimo. Penal del Circuito de Manizales en tanto amparó los derechos fundamentales del señor Ángel Custodio Ramírez Garzón. ANÚLASE todo lo actuado durante la etapa del juicio dentro de la causa 6668 seguida en contra de Ángel Custodio Ramírez Garzón como presunto responsable de la muerte del señor Guillermo López Cárdenas y SÚRTASE de nuevo juicio criminal sometido a las garantías constitucionales y legales del debido proceso.
  4. Tercero. LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.