JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 22, 2000

T-767 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Alvaristo Howard Bernard

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida. Paciente Inmovilizado Que No Es Atendido Por El Iss Por Mora En Aportes Del Municipio De San Andres. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleador
  • Responsabilidad por servicios de salud
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • No continuación prestación del servicio por mora de aportes
  • Repetición contra el empleador
Servicio De Salud
  • Responsabilidad compartida entre patrono y EPS
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decisión de el Juzgado Promiscuo de Familia proferida el 12 de enero del 2000, y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela por las razones expuestas en este fallo.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que los Seguros Sociales le den el tratamiento que señale el médico tratante al señor Alvaristo Howard Bernard pudiendo repetir contra el FOSIGA.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.