JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 26, 1998

T-729 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Oscar Toro Ocampo Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Asociacion Y Libertad Sindical. Fuero Sindical. Reintegro De Trabajadores Y Pago De Salarios. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Reintegro
  • Despido de trabajador sin permiso judicial amparado por fuero sindical
Administracion Departamental
  • Supresión de cargos amparados o no por fuero sindical
Jurisdiccion Laboral
  • Competencia para resolver conflictos sobre fuero sindical de empleados públicos
Perjuicio Irremediable
  • Inexistencia por despido de trabajador sin permiso judicial amparado o no por fuero sindical
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por la Sala Civil Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Popayan, el dia 30 de julio de 1998, y en su lugar RECHAZAR por improcedentes las demandas de tutela promovidas por los demandantes en los procesos de la referencia.
  4. Segundo. LIBRENSE por Secretaria las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli establecidos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.