JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 1996

T-713 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Abelardo Antonio Porras

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Tutela Contra El Ruido. Libertad De Cultos. Pastor Evangelico. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Indefension
  • Improcedencia por existencia de mecanismos de defensa
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por los juzgados
  2. Quinto. Civil Municipal y
  3. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Palmira, del 16 de julio y 12 de agosto de 1996, respectivamente, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela instaurada por ABELARDO PORRAS contra Freddy Herrera, Delegado para la Protección y Vigilancia del Medio Ambiente y el Espacio Público, y contra los particulares Carlos Alberto Perea, Adiela y Constanza Carvajal y, en consecuencia, no conceder el amparo impetrado.
  4. Segundo. REMITASE copia del expediente y del presente fallo al Alcalde Municipal de Palmira, para que, en el ámbito de su competencia, adopte las medidas a que hubiere lugar como primera autoridad de Policía del Municipio (artículo 315, numeral 2, C.P.)
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.