JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 1997

T-637 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Fernando Socha Barbosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reliquidacion De Pension De Jubilacion. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para ordenar reliquidación de pensiones
Derecho De Peticion
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del juzgado diecisiete civil del circuito de Santa Fe de Bogotá proferido el veinticinco de agosto de mil novecientos noventa y siete y en su lugar se deniega la tutela formulada por el actor referente a reliquidación de su pensión de jubilación, pero sí se protege el derecho de petición del accionante y en consecuencia se le ordena a la Caja de Previsión Social que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación del presente fallo, si aún no lo ha hecho, proceda a dar respuesta a la petición elevada por el señor Fernando Socha respecto a su reliquidación de pensión de jubilación.
  2. DESE CUMPLIMIENTO a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.