T-629 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Luz Magnolia Gomez Gomez Vs. Empresa Antioqueña De Energia S.A.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por no encontrarse demostrados los elementos de protección de la mujer trabajadora embarazada
- No información al empleador sobre su estado
- Su condición no era un hecho notorio
- Elementos fácticos que deben demostrarse
- Reintegro al cargo
- No remisión oportuna del expediente a la Corte Constitucional
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por los Juzgados Quince Penal Municipal y
- Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Medellin, que negaron la tutela de la senora Luz Magnolia Gomez Gomez.
- Segundo. COMPULSAR copias de esta decision y del proceso al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Antioquia, Sala Disciplinaria, para que proceda a realizar las investigaciones a que hubiere lugar, respecto de todos los funcionarios del Juzgado
- Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Medellin, que de una u otra manera hubiesen tenido que ver en su oportunidad en el tramite del presente expediente de tutela.
- Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.