JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 18, 2002

T-542 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Jose Ines Casseres Reyes Vs. Unimec

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Seguridad Social Vida Salud Y Trabajo. Mora En Pago De Aportes Por Parte Del Empleador. Hecho Superado. Falta Disciplinaria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derechos Fundamentales
  • Vulneración por mora en aportes en salud por parte de empleador
Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado
Empleador
  • Mora de aportes a seguridad social
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo adoptado por el Juzgado
  2. Séptimo. Penal Municipal de Cartagena, Bolívar, el 3 de abril de 2001 en virtud de la acción de tutela presentada por el señor JOSÉ INÉS CASSERES REYES, pero por tratarse de un hecho superado.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR que, por la Secretaría General de la Corporación, se compulsen copias de la totalidad del expediente y se remitan a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Bolívar, para los fines indicados en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR que por Secretaria general, se libren las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.