JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 28, 1998

T-611 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Luis Alberto Gomez Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Reclamar El Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Flota Mercante. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general para reclamar pago de acreencias laborales
  • Subsidiariedad
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Legalidad de suspensión de contratos
  • Declaración de subsistencia de vínculo laboral
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las siguientes sentencias proferidas por los siguientes juzgados de Santa Fe de Bogotá: Juzgado Treinta y Cinco Penal del Circuito ( 19 de mayo de 1998 ) en el expediente T-168916; Juzgado catorce penal del Circuito (Junio 9 de 1998 ) en el expediente T-172249; Juzgado Veintiséis Penal Municipal (mayo 22 de 1998) en el expediente T-177650; Juzgado veintisiete penal del Circuito (junio 2 de 1998 ) en el expediente T-172347; Juzgado cuarenta y uno Penal del Circuito (19 de mayo de 1998 ) en el expediente T-172317.
  2. Segundo. Líbrense por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591, para los efectos allí previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.