JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 21, 1999

T-009 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Fermin Aurelio Hernandez Galvan

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Minimo Vital Pago De Mesadas Pensionales Atrasadas. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala Plena del Tribunal Administrativo de Bolivar. En su lugar CONCEDER la presente tutela por violacion del derecho fundamental al pago oportuno de las mesadas pensionales.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Departamento de Bolivar, representado por el senor Gobernador, para que en el termino maximo de un (1) mes, contado a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, proceda, si aun no lo ha hecho, a cancelar al demandante las mesadas pensionales correspondientes a los meses de julio, agosto y septiembre de 1998, siempre y cuando disponga de los recursos presupuestales para ello. Si no los tuviere, dispondra del mencionado termino para iniciar los tramites correspondientes a fin de lograr la consecucion de dichos recursos, y proceder de esa manera a cancelar al actor las mesadas pensionales ya senaladas.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.