JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 15, 2000

T-543 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Luz Marina Cogollo Mejia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Frente A Particulares. Electricaribe S.A. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Organizaciones Privadas
  • Alcance
  • Dignidad del trabajador hace exigible respuesta de particulares
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Santa Marta, proferido el 29 de octubre de 1999, al resolver la acción de tutela incoada por Luz Marina Cogollo Mejía, contra ELECTRICARIBE S.A. ESP y, en consecuencia, proteger el derecho de petición de la accionante.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la empresa ELECTRICARIBE S.A. ESP que, dentro del término de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, entregue a Luz Marina Cogollo Mejía la fotocopia del SOAT y de todos los seguros, correspondientes al vehículo OWJ-546 en el cual perdió la vida Alonso Amador Valle.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1.991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.