JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 26, 2002

T-494 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Franz Halter Vs. Luciano Martinez Legazpi

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Honra Y Buen Nombre De Banquero Suizo. Cobro Extraproceso Por Supuesta Estafa. Constreñimiento. Situacion De Indefension. Acceso A La Administracion De Justicia. Tutela Contra Particulares. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Buen Nombre Y A La Honra
  • Vulneración por utilizar medios de justicia personal y privada
Derecho Al Buen Nombre
  • Vulneración
  • Divulgación descalificadora y deshonrosa en medios de comunicación a un grupo de personas
  • Mérito como presupuesto indispensable
  • Alcance
Justicia Por Propia Mano
  • Actos inválidos e ilícitos
Mecanismos Extrajuridicos
  • Improcedencia para pago de suma de dinero
Derecho A La Honra
  • Alcance
  • Protección
Indefension
  • Constreñimiento mediante conducta ilícita para realizar el pago de una obligación
7 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida en el proceso de la referencia por el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca -Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria-, el 24 de enero de 2002.
  2. Segundo. Dar cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.