JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 17, 1992

T-412 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Luz Marina Avila

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Buen Nombre. Derecho A La Honra. Procedencia De Cobro Judicial. Chepitos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la Providencia proferida por el Juzgado 11 Penal Municipal de Santafe de Bogota, de fecha enero 30 de 1.992, mediante la cual denego la solicitud de tutela que presento la Sra. Luz Marina Avila Castro, por las razones expuestas en esta Sentencia.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la Accion de Tutela a la Sra. Luz Marina Avila Castro, por las razones expuestas en esta Sentencia.
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR al Juez 11 Penal Municipal de Santafe de Bogota que prevenga a la Sociedad CRESISTEMAS S.A., en cabeza de su Representante Legal, para que en lo sucesivo se abstenga de incurrir en el tipo de comportamiento que desato esta accion de tutela, so pena de hacerse merecedora de una sancion establecida en el articulo 53 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Cuarto. COMPULSAR copias de esta Sentencia de Revision al Juez de Juez de Instruccion Criminal (reparto) de Santafe de Bogota para la de su competencia, por conducto de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional.
  5. Quinto. COMPULSAR copias de esta Sentencia de Revision a la Superintendencia de Sociedades para lo de su competencia, por conducto de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional.
  6. Sexto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.