JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 18, 1997

T-454 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Alexandra Ripoll Alvarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. No Se Respondieron Los Recursos Interpuestos Por La Actora. Universidad Del Atlantico. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las providencias del 7 de marzo y 22 de abril de 1997, proferidos por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil Municipal y
  3. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla, respectivamente, mediante las cuales se denego y confirmo respectivamente el amparo de los derechos a la igualdad y trabajo invocados como violados por la senora Alexandra Ripoll Alvarez.
  4. Segundo. TUTELAR solamente el derecho fundamental de peticion de la senora Alexandra Ripoll Alvarez. En consecuencia, ordenase a la Universidad del Atlantico que, dentro del termino de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de la presente sentencia, resuelva -afirmativa o negativamente-, si ya no lo hubiere hecho y si el recurrente no ha acudido ya a la jurisdiccion Contencioso Administrativa, los recursos interpuestos por la actora.
  5. Tercero. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.