JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 12, 1993

T-442 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Pedro Cadena

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Via De Hecho. Acumulacion De Procesos Ejecutivos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Confirmar la providencia de fecha veintiuno (21) de Abril de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cartagena, mediante la cual se negó la tutela promovida por el señor Pedro Cadena Copete.
  4. SEGUNDO. Líbrese comunicación al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cartagena para los fines señalados por el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.