JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 26, 2009

T-421 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Abel Mateus·Respondent Fenalco Bogota

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al habeas data invocado por ciudadano que aparece como titular de un reporte negativo emitido por datacredito y la cifin en razon de una obligacion que tuviese con la entidad demandada, pero que segun su dicho, estaria prescrita. <br>una vez verificada la satisfaccion del requisito de haber agotado la solicitud previa ante la entidad correspondiente, la sala trajo a colacion lo dispuesto en sentencia c-1011 de 2008 y la generalidad del precedente en la materia, y sostuvo que la fijacion de la fecha en que se dio la prescripcion es un asunto que excede la competencia del juez constitucional, por tanto, al petente le toca remitirse a la autoridad competente, para asi, poder acceder a su pretension. <br>negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos, en primera instancia, por el Juzgado Sesenta y Cinco (65) Penal Municipal de Control de Garantías de Bogotá, el seis (06) de enero de 2009 y en segunda instancia, por el Juzgado Cuarenta y uno (41) Penal Municipal, el dos (02) de marzo de 2009, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Líbrese por Secretaría General la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.